Deaf People: Bad News From State Supreme Court
I’m interrupting my long-planned break from blogging. I’ve taken short breaks before, but not an extended break since I began blogging almost three years ago. I’m also spending minimal time on the Internet. So far, the break has been wonderful and I’m loving it. I don’t know how much longer the break will last, though. Many people have asked me to blog on assorted topics, but I’ve declined since I needed the break big time. However, this one is too important, as the legal system as it impacts the Deaf community is an important issue for me.
Deaf woman’s murder, kidnapping convictions upheld | Grand Forks Herald | Grand Forks, North Dakota
This is bad news. Let me explain the reasons.
First of all, let me tell you I’m biased. I feel Daphne Wright deserved the death penalty because I’m convinced the killing was pre-meditated. Based on my extensive interviews with people who knew her well, in NC, MD and elsewhere, the police let the Deaf Community down for a long time by failing to arrest and prosecute this woman years ago. She was a ticking time bomb and it was a matter of time before she killed someone. It was no surprise that she ended up being charged with a murder. I felt sick to my stomach when I arrived at that sad conclusion.
However, as a civil rights activist, I see the recent decision of the South Dakota Supreme Court not to hear her appeal as a bad decision. It’s true that she didn’t receive equal accessibility during her trial. Her lawyer’s request for a certified Deaf interpreter for the deaf (CDI) was declined by the local judge. All the interpreters at court were supposed to be fluent in ASL, yet at least one interpreter used SEE. What the heck??? CART was provided on site as a back up, but she didn’t possess the fluency in English to fully understand the typed materials. Apparently none of the other interpreters on site took the time to inform her lawyer that she didn’t interpret ASL. After several spectators told me, I passed the news on to her lawyer who was apparently surprised at receiving this news. Good grief. Wasn’t there a consultant appointed to oversee the interpreters and ensure they are qualified to interpret a death penalty murder trial? It was unsettling to realize no safety net was provided for this Deaf defendant. By the way, for a lawyer with no previous experience representing a Deaf client, it’s my personal opinion that this defense lawyer did a pretty good job. She tried her best and she managed to get a life sentence for the defendant, no small feat. But overall, this experience demonstrates a tremendous need to educate the justice system regarding the needs of Deaf people.
Over the years, It had become painfully obvious to me that the rights of Deaf people in the legal system are not protected. I feel very fortunate that I was able to locate a superb lawyer for my hospital lawsuit, but it was not by coincidence. I did a lot of legal legwork and looked high and low for a hungry and aggressive lawyer, interviewing many lawyers before I settled on one. I conferred with the lawyer prior to depositions and court hearing regarding the communication needs of the Deaf people and discovered that she also recalled the mistakes made during the murder trial of Carl Dupree, during which the interpreters basically bungled their jobs. Prior to that court case in early 1990’s, it was assumed that the failure to understand the interpreters was due to Deaf people’s ‘limited English skills’, but that particular case proved poor comprehension wasn’t necessarily the cause, but due to the skills of the interpreters, a stunning and disturbing revelation for the lawyers and advocates of Deaf people. Unlike earlier cases, the Deaf witnesses and involved Deaf parties were college students and college graduates, some of them bearers of advanced degrees. Anyway, I realize I am the exception and not many people, including hearing people, have the same privileges I have. The majority of the public would be out of their league in the legal system to begin with–much more so for the Deaf.
I don’t think there are many people who are still convinced of Daphne Wright’s innocence. I am looking at the big picture. What if this Deaf defendant had been railroaded by shoddy police work and turned out to be innocent? And ended up in jail because of inappropriate interpreting work? Where is the protection for Deaf defendants and plaintiffs? To realize that in the 21st Century, there still aren’t adequate safeguards for Deaf people in the legal system is ominous.
